4.1 Article

Intracellular signaling pathways regulate hormone-dependent kallikrein gene expression

Journal

TUMOR BIOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages 63-75

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000135686

Keywords

kallikreins; breast cancer; gene expression; intracellular signaling pathways; steroid hormones; chemical inhibitors, hormone-dependent expression; transcription factors; androgen receptor

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Our aim was to examine how certain signal transduction pathways influence the regulation of hormone-dependent kallikrein (KLK) gene expression in androgen-sensitive breast cancer cell lines. Methods: We used the breast cancer cell lines T47D and BT474, treated with steroid hormones or various pathway inhibitors. KLKs were quantified by ELISA. RT-PCR, Western blots and immunoprecipitations were used to assess transcript and protein levels. Results: PSA, KLK10, KLK11, KLK13 and KLK14 are upregulated upon androgen stimulation in the T47D cell line. The expression of PSA, KLK10 and KLK11 was repressed by the MEK1/2 inhibitor U0126 and the PI3K inhibitor Wortmannin in the presence of the hormone, thus implicating the RAS/MEK/ERK and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways in regulating hormone-dependent KLK gene activation. Analysis of inhibitor-treated cells revealed changes in c-MYC expression with a pattern parallel to KLK gene expression. Chromatin immunoprecipitations identified androgen-dependent recruitment of specific transcription factors to the KLK proximal promoters, including c-MYC binding to PSA and KLK11. Conclusion: The hormone-specific upregulation of PSA, KLK10 and KLK11 in the breast cancer cell line T47D is dependent on major intracellular signaling pathways. This work provides a new dimension to the regulation of these cancer-related genes and the potential for new therapeutic targeting strategies. Copyright (C) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available