4.3 Article

Antigen persistence of rapid diagnostic tests in pregnant women in Nanoro, Burkina Faso, and the implications for the diagnosis of malaria in pregnancy

Journal

TROPICAL MEDICINE & INTERNATIONAL HEALTH
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages 550-557

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2012.02975.x

Keywords

malaria; pregnancy; Plasmodium falciparum; diagnostic tests; antigen persistence; treatment follow-up; paludisme; malaria; grossesse; Plasmodium falciparum; tests de diagnostic; persistance des antigenes; suivi du traitement; Malaria; Embarazo; Plasmodium falciparum; pruebas diagnosticas; persistencia de antigeno; seguimiento del tratamiento

Funding

  1. Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND)
  2. PREGACT trial in Burkina Faso

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives To evaluate persistence of several Plasmodium antigens in pregnant women after treatment and compare diagnostics during treatment follow-up. methods Thirty-two pregnant women (N = 32) with confirmed malaria infection by a histidine-rich protein 2 (HRP2)-based rapid diagnostic test (RDT) and microscopy were followed for 28 days after artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT). A Plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH)-based RDT and two ELISAs based on the detection of dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase (DHFRTS) and haeme detoxification protein (HDP) were compared with each other and to RT-PCR at each visit. results The mean visit number (95% confidence interval) on which the HRP2-based RDT was still positive after treatment was 3.4 (2.7-4.1) visits with some patients still positive at day 28. This is significantly later than the pLDH-based RDT [0.84 (0.55-1.1)], microscopy (median 1, range 1-3), DHFR-TS-ELISA [1.7 (1.1-2.3)] and RT-PCR (median 2, range 1-5) (P < 0.05), but not significantly later than HDP-ELISA [2.1 (1.6-2.7)]. Lower gravidity and higher parasite density at day 0 resulted in significantly longer positive results with most tests (P < 0.05). conclusions HRP2 can persist up to 28 days after ACT treatment; therefore, this test is not suitable for treatment follow-up in pregnant women and can generate problems when using this test during intermittent preventive treatment (IPTp). DHFR-TS is less persistent than HRP2, making it a potentially interesting target for diagnosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available