4.3 Article

Patterns of uptake of HIV testing in sub-Saharan Africa in the pre-treatment era

Journal

TROPICAL MEDICINE & INTERNATIONAL HEALTH
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages e26-e37

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2011.02937.x

Keywords

HIV; testing; sub-Saharan Africa

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council [G0600719B, G0600719] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. Medical Research Council [G0600719] Funding Source: Medline
  3. MRC [G0600719] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives To compare nationally representative trends in self-reported uptake of HIV testing and receipt of results in selected countries prior to treatment scale-up. Methods Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data from 13 countries in sub-Saharan Africa were used to describe the pattern of uptake of testing for HIV among sexually active participants. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to analyse the associations between socio-demographic and behavioural characteristics and the uptake of testing. Results Knowledge of serostatus ranged from 2.2% among women in Guinea (2005) to 27.4% among women in Rwanda (2005). Despite varied levels of testing, univariate analysis showed the profile of testers to be remarkably similar across countries, with respect to socio-demographic characteristics such as area of residence and socio-economic status. HIV-positive participants were more likely to have tested and received their results than HIV-negative participants, with the exception of women in Senegal and men in Guinea. Adjusted analyses indicate that a secondary or higher level of education was a key determinant of testing, and awareness that treatment exists was independently positively associated with testing, once other characteristics were taken into account. Conclusion This work provides a baseline for monitoring trends in testing and exploring changes in the profile of those who get tested after the introduction and scale-up of treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available