4.3 Article

Traditional llama husbandry and breeding management in the Ayopaya region, Bolivia

Journal

TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages 79-87

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11250-009-9388-6

Keywords

Bolivian highlands; Llamas; Ratio-scale evaluation; Selection criteria; Smallholder farmers

Funding

  1. DAAD (German Academic Exchange Service)
  2. NGO ASAR (Asociacion de Servicios Artesanales y Rurales)
  3. farmers' association ORPACA (Organizacion Regional de Productores Agropecuarios de Calientes)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The llama claims the largest population of the domestic South American camelids, most of which are raised in Bolivia. More than 53,000 rural families are dedicated to llama husbandry as part of their livelihood strategy. Contemporary Andean societies deliberately select animals for specific traits and employ substantial livestock management to secure subsistence. This study presents traditional llama husbandry and breeding management activities in the Ayopaya region, Bolivia. Traditional selection traits for male and female llamas are documented and assessed by a ranking and a ratio-scaled evaluation. Husbandry and management parameters are in concordance with other studies conducted in the region, but show a high variation. Average llama herd sizes are rather small (mu = 45.6). In some herds, breeding males are utilized for a long time and mix with other herds, causing concerns about inbreeding. Preferred trait groups for llama males according to farmers' responses were body conformation, fibre, testicle conformation, fleece colour and height at withers. Traditional selection criteria generally relate to the phenotype, but also include the commercially interesting fibre trait. The presented results should be considered in breeding and management programmes for the respective llama population to ensure sustainable use of this genetically and culturally valuable resource.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available