4.3 Article

Immune responses to haemorrhagic septicaemia (HS) vaccination in Trypanosoma evansi infected buffalo-calves

Journal

TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION
Volume 42, Issue 4, Pages 589-595

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11250-009-9461-1

Keywords

Buffalo-calves; Humoral and cellular responses; Immunosuppression; HS Vaccine; Surra; Trypanosoma evansi

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To assess the immunosuppressive effect of Trypanosoma evansi infection in buffalo-calves on immune responses to heterologous antigen, the study was planned to examine the responses of haemorrhagic septicaemia vaccination in simultaneously and previously (80 days before vaccination) T. evansi-infected buffalo-calves. Eight buffalo-calves were divided into three groups. Buffalo-calves of group A (n = 3) were previously (80 days before primary vaccination with haemorrhagic septicaemia [HS] vaccine) infected with T. evansi (1 x 10(7) tryps.calf(-1); sc) and that of group B (n = 3) were infected with T. evansi (1 x 10(7) tryps.calf(-1); sc) on the day of primary vaccination with HS vaccine. Two healthy uninfected control calves given only HS vaccine were kept in group C. All the buffalo-calves were given a booster dose of vaccine 21 days post-primary vaccination (PPV). Twenty eight days PPV, animals of group A were given trypanocidal quinapyramine prosalt at 6.66 mg kg(-1). Immunosuppressive effect of T. evansi infection was evident from day 7 PPV with HS vaccine. The effect was more pronounced in previously T. evansi-infected buffalo-calves as compared with simultaneously infected buffalo-calves. Group A buffalo-calves appeared to have recovered from the immunosuppressive effect after 28 days post-trypanocidal treatment as observed by humoral and cell-mediated immune responses. Immunosuppressive effect to HS vaccination was observed in T. evansi-infected buffalo-calves, and trypanocidal therapy enabled the calves to mount the responses similar to uninfected controls.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available