4.2 Article

The timing of solid introduction in an obesogenic' environment: a narrative review of the evidence and methodological issues

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1753-6405.12376

Keywords

complementary feeding; developed countries; obesity; narrative review

Funding

  1. Meat & Livestock Australia
  2. Endeavour Scholarships
  3. H.J. Heinz
  4. Cancer Research UK [14133] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To evaluate the evidence for association between obesity risk outcomes >12 months of age and timing of solid introduction in healthy term infants in developed countries, the large majority of whom are not exclusively breastfed to six months of age. Methods: Studies included were published 1990 to March 2013. Results: Twenty-six papers with weight status or obesity prevalence outcomes were identified. Studies were predominantly cohort design, most with important methodological limitations. Ten studies reported a positive association. Of these, only two were large, good-quality studies and both examined the outcome of early (<4 months) introduction of solids. None of the four good-quality studies that directly evaluated current guidelines provided evidence of any clinically relevant protective effect of solid introduction from 4-5 versus 6 months of age. Conclusion: The introduction of solids prior to 4 months of age may result in increased risk of childhood obesity but there is little evidence of adverse weight status outcomes associated with introducing solids at 4-6 rather than at six months. Implications: More and better quality evidence is required to inform guidelines on the when, what and how' of complementary feeding.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available