4.1 Article

Phrenic nerve conduction studies as a biomarker of respiratory insufficiency in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Journal

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/21678421.2015.1112406

Keywords

Phrenic; amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; neurophysiology; biomarker; ventilation

Funding

  1. Muscular Dystrophy Association
  2. ALS Association and Synapse Biomedical
  3. Philips Respironics
  4. Will Rogers Respiratory Institute of the ALS Association

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Our objective was to examine the value of phrenic nerve conduction studies (PNCS) in quantifying diaphragm dysfunction in ALS, as no ideal test of respiratory insufficiency exists in ALS. We prospectively recorded bilateral PNCS, forced vital capacity (FVC), maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP), respiratory rate, ALSFRS-R, and respiratory symptoms in 100 ALS patients attending our clinic over a nine-month period. Survival data were collected for two years. Results showed that PNCS were reproducible and well tolerated. When the Pamp was abnormal (<0.3 mV), the relative risk of a respiratory rate >18 was 7.2 (95% CI 2.2-37.2, p<0.01) compared with a Pamp >= 0.3 mV. Similarly, the relative risk of orthopnea was 3.5 (95% CI 1.6-8.7, p<0.01) and dyspnea 2.4 (95% CI 1.4-4.0, p<0.01). FVC had the strongest correlation with Pamp (R-2 = 0.48 (p<0.001)). Fourteen of 15 patients with a FVC <50% had a Pamp <0.3 mV. However, eight with a Pamp<0.3 had a FVC >80%. The median survival was 1.07 years when the Pamp was <0.3 mV and >2 years when the Pamp was >0.3 mV (p<0.001). In conclusion, the phrenic Pamp correlated closely with multiple symptoms, signs, and laboratory measures of respiratory insufficiency and may prove to be a useful biomarker of respiratory dysfunction in ALS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available