4.6 Review

Stuck in a rut: rethinking depression and its treatment

Journal

TRENDS IN NEUROSCIENCES
Volume 34, Issue 1, Pages 1-9

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE LONDON
DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2010.10.004

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Dana Foundation
  2. Greenwall Foundation
  3. NARSAD
  4. National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) [K23 MH077869]
  5. National Institutes of Health
  6. Northstar, Inc.
  7. Stanley Medical Research Institute
  8. Woodruff Foundation
  9. AvaCat Consulting
  10. St Jude Medical Neuromodulation
  11. Oppenheimer Co.
  12. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [K23MH077869] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The current definition of major depressive disorder (MDD) emerged from efforts to create reliable diagnostic criteria for clinical and research use. However, despite decades of research, the neurobiology of MDD is largely unknown, and treatments are no more effective today than they were 50-70 years ago. Here, we propose that the current conception of depression is misguiding basic and clinical research. Redefinition is necessary and could include a focus on a more narrowly defined set of core symptoms. However, we conclude that depression is better defined as the tendency to enter into, and inability to disengage from, a negative mood state rather than the mood state per se. We also discuss the implications of this revised definition for future clinical and basic research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available