4.7 Review

Clostridium difficile spore biology: sporulation, germination, and spore structural proteins

Journal

TRENDS IN MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 7, Pages 406-416

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tim.2014.04.003

Keywords

C. difficile spores; sporulation; germination; spore coat; exosporium

Funding

  1. Fondo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia de Chile (FONDECYT ) [1110569]
  2. Research Office of Universidad Andres Bello [DI-275-R113]
  3. Fondo de Fomento al Desarrollo Cientifico y Tecnologico (FONDEF) [CA13110077]
  4. Pew Charitable Trusts
  5. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [P2ORR021905]
  6. American Heart Association National Scientist Development [11SDG7160013]
  7. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [R21A107640]
  8. [R00GM092934]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Clostridium difficile is a Gram-positive, spore-forming obligate anaerobe and a major nosocomial pathogen of worldwide concern. Owing to its strict anaerobic requirements, the infectious and transmissible morphotype is the dormant spore. In susceptible patients, C. difficile spores germinate in the colon to form the vegetative cells that initiate Clostridium difficile infections (CDI). During CDI, C. difficile induces a sporulation pathway that produces more spores; these spores are responsible for the persistence of C. difficile in patients and horizontal transmission between hospitalized patients. Although important to the C. difficile lifecycle, the C. difficile spore proteome is poorly conserved when compared to members of the Bacillus genus. Further, recent studies have revealed significant differences between C. difficile and Bacillus subtilis at the level of sporulation, germination, and spore coat and exosporium morphogenesis. In this review, the regulation of the sporulation and germination pathways and the morphogenesis of the spore coat and exosporium will be discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available