4.6 Review

Functional modules, mutational load and human genetic disease

Journal

TRENDS IN GENETICS
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages 168-176

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE LONDON
DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2010.01.006

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute of Child Health and Development [R01HD04260]
  2. National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive, and Kidney Disorders [R01DK072301, R01DK075972]
  3. Macular Vision Research Foundation
  4. Visual NeuroscienceTraining Program
  5. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [R01HD042601] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [P30DK079637, R01DK072301, R01DK075972] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ability to generate a massive amount of sequencing and genotyping data is transforming the study of human genetic disorders. Driven by such innovation, it is likely that whole exome and whole-genome resequencing will replace regionally focused approaches for gene discovery and clinical testing in the next few years. However, this opportunity brings a significant interpretative challenge to assigning function and phenotypic variance to common and rare alleles. Understanding the effect of individual mutations in the context of the remaining genomic variation represents a major challenge to our interpretation of disease. Here, we discuss the challenges of assigning mutation functionality and, drawing from the examples of ciliopathies as well as cohesinopathies and channelopathies, discuss possibilities for the functional modularization of the human genome. Functional modularization in addition to the development of physiologically relevant assays to test allele functionality will accelerate our understanding of disease architecture and enable the use of genome-wide sequence data for disease diagnosis and phenotypic prediction in individuals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available