4.7 Article

Impact of heavy metals from flue gas integration with microalgae production

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.algal.2015.01.003

Keywords

Flue gas; Heavy metals; Lipid accumulation; Biodiesel; Microalgae; Scenedesmus obliquus

Funding

  1. Department of Energy [DE-EE0003114]
  2. Utah Science and Technology Initiative for Economic Development [A16114]
  3. Arizona Public Service [SPO 090448]
  4. National Science Foundation [1335550]
  5. Directorate For Engineering
  6. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1335550] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Integration of microalgae cultivation with coal-based flue gas is a widely proposed approach to supply carbon dioxide (CO2). The utilization of coal derived CO2 in microalgae growth systems will introduce heavy metals (toxic metals and metalloids), originally present in coal, into the cultivation system. This study evaluates the effect of 10 heavy metals (As, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Hg, Ni, Pb, Se and Zn) at four different concentrations on the growth and lipid yield of microalgae, Scenedesmus obliquus. Results show at the baseline heavy metal concentration of 1x, corresponding to the concentrations expected from a coal fired power plant, a 12% higher biomass and 61% higher lipid yield when compared to a control containing no heavy metals. Higher concentrations of heavy metals, twofold (2x), fivefold (5x) and tenfold (10x), are shown to inhibit both growth and lipid production. Analysis shows that most heavy metals added to the culture were sorbed to the biomass with Hg mostly lost to the environment. Discussion focuses on how flue gas-derived heavy metals could result in both positive and negative outcomes for biomass and biodiesel production and the environmental implications of a commercial microalgae growth system that utilizes coal based flue gas as a CO2 source. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available