4.7 Article

Informatics for improved algal taxonomic classification and research: A case study of UTEX 2341

Journal

ALGAL RESEARCH-BIOMASS BIOFUELS AND BIOPRODUCTS
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages 545-549

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.algal.2015.10.016

Keywords

UTEX 2341; Chlorella minutissima; Auxenochlorella protothecoides

Funding

  1. NSF [CBET-1438211, MCB-1139644]
  2. National Institute of Food and Agriculture [CA-D-BAE-2228-RR]
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences [1139644] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems [1139644] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  6. Directorate For Engineering [1438211] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Algal research has the potential to address numerous industrial and environmental challenges. Despite this potential, informatics data for algae are relatively modest limiting the development of algal biotechnology. This study reports on the re-classification of the green algae strain UTEX 2341 as a case study demonstrating the need for improved public informatics data for algae. Observations in the literature from lipid and pigment research led to uncertainty surrounding the identity of UTEX 2341, originally classified as Chlorella minutissima. In this study, lipid and conserved-gene sequencing data were combined to establish the identity of UTEX 2341 as Auxenochlorella protothecoides. Unambiguous identification of strains that are maintained over long periods of time will require sufficient allocation of resources to culture collections. Furthermore, development of repositories for biochemical and physiological data, along with DNA sequence information, are needed to facilitate sharing of strain data between research institutions and culture collections. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available