4.7 Article

Molecular gastronomy: a food fad or science supporting innovative cuisine?

Journal

TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages 372-382

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE LONDON
DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2008.01.006

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The concepts, history and approaches of molecular gastronomy are discussed with an emphasis on the relation to food science and technology. A distinction is made between molecular gastronomy and science-based cooking, where the first relates to the scientific understanding of the cooking and eating processes and the latter refers to the application of the principles and tools from science for the development of new dishes, particularly in the context of haute cuisine. We argue that science-based cooking is closely associated with significant technological developments, as the realization of novel dishes frequently requires the use of non-traditional ingredients or preparation techniques, which are often derived from those used in industrial food production. Several approaches towards the scientific understanding of foods are highlighted, including the complex disperse system (CDS) formalism of This and the systematic compilation and interpretation of scientific and non-scientific information relating to foods, their ingredients and preparation methods as shaped into its modern form by McGee. We discuss how chefs are dealing with the available systematic knowledge on food and cooking, and how molecular gastronomy can facilitate the cumbersome, but much needed discussions among food scientists and chefs. Finally, we discuss the implications of molecular gastronomy for society. This includes the way the general public is considering food, and how molecular gastronomy could inspire food technologists to increasingly emphasize aspects relating to food origin, quality, and creativity in their product development efforts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available