Journal
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages 203-208Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE LONDON
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2012.01.004
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- EPSRC [EP/F043112/1]
- NERC
- VIDI from NWO-ALW
- NSF [DEB-0919499]
- NSERC (Canada)
- EPSRC [EP/F043112/1] Funding Source: UKRI
- NERC [NE/I021179/1] Funding Source: UKRI
- Division Of Environmental Biology
- Direct For Biological Sciences [0919499] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/F043112/1] Funding Source: researchfish
- Natural Environment Research Council [NE/I021179/1] Funding Source: researchfish
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Ecological neutral theory has elicited strong opinions in recent years. Here, we review these opinions and strip away some unfortunate problems with semantics to reveal three major underlying questions. Only one of these relates to neutral theory and the importance of ecological drift, whereas the others involve the link between pattern and process, the tradeoff between simplicity and complexity in modeling, and the role of stochasticity and drift in ecology. We explain how neutral theory cannot be simultaneously used both as a null hypothesis and as an,approximation. However, we also show how neutral theory always has a valuable use in one of these two roles even though the real world is not neutral.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available