4.7 Article

The case for ecological neutral theory

Journal

TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages 203-208

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE LONDON
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2012.01.004

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. EPSRC [EP/F043112/1]
  2. NERC
  3. VIDI from NWO-ALW
  4. NSF [DEB-0919499]
  5. NSERC (Canada)
  6. EPSRC [EP/F043112/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. NERC [NE/I021179/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Division Of Environmental Biology
  9. Direct For Biological Sciences [0919499] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  10. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/F043112/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  11. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/I021179/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ecological neutral theory has elicited strong opinions in recent years. Here, we review these opinions and strip away some unfortunate problems with semantics to reveal three major underlying questions. Only one of these relates to neutral theory and the importance of ecological drift, whereas the others involve the link between pattern and process, the tradeoff between simplicity and complexity in modeling, and the role of stochasticity and drift in ecology. We explain how neutral theory cannot be simultaneously used both as a null hypothesis and as an,approximation. However, we also show how neutral theory always has a valuable use in one of these two roles even though the real world is not neutral.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available