Journal
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages 288-295Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE LONDON
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.12.004
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- Royal Society
- BBSRC
- Swiss National Science Foundation
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Humans use punishment to promote cooperation in laboratory experiments but evidence that punishment plays a similar role in non-human animals is comparatively rare. In this article, we examine why this may be the case by reviewing evidence from both laboratory experiments on humans and ecologically relevant studies on non-human animals. Generally, punishment appears to be most probable if players differ in strength or strategic options. Although these conditions are common in nature, punishment (unlike other forms of aggression) involves immediate payoff reductions to both punisher and target, with net benefits to punishers contingent on cheats behaving more cooperatively in future interactions. In many cases, aggression yielding immediate benefits may suffice to deter cheats and might explain the relative scarcity of punishment in nature.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available