4.7 Review

Peto's Paradox: evolution's prescription for cancer prevention

Journal

TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages 175-182

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE LONDON
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.01.002

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US Department of Energy [DE-FG02-97ER25308]
  2. Martha W. Rodgers Charitable Trust
  3. Landon AACR Innovator Award for Cancer Prevention
  4. American Cancer Society [117209-RSG-09-163-01-CNE]
  5. NIH [R03 CA137811, P01 CA91955, P30 CA010815, R01 CA119224, R01 CA140657]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The evolution of multicellularity required the suppression of cancer. If every cell has some chance of becoming cancerous, large, long-lived organisms should have an increased risk of developing cancer compared with small, short-lived organisms. The lack of correlation between body size and cancer risk is known as Peto's paradox. Animals with 1000 times more cells than humans do not exhibit an increased cancer risk, suggesting that natural mechanisms can suppress cancer 1000 times more effectively than is done in human cells. Because cancer has proven difficult to cure, attention has turned to cancer prevention. In this review, similar to pharmaceutical companies mining natural products, we seek to understand how evolution has suppressed cancer to develop ultimately improved cancer prevention in humans.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available