4.7 Article

Three roads diverged? Routes to phylogeographic inference

Journal

TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages 626-632

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE LONDON
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2010.08.010

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [0635561, DMS 0856099]
  2. Fund for Scientific Research (FWO) Flanders
  3. United States National Institutes of Health [R01 GM086887]
  4. Marsden Fund, New Zealand
  5. European Research Council under European Union [FP7/2007-2013]
  6. ERC [260864]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Phylogeographic methods facilitate inference of the geographical history of genetic lineages. Recent examples explore human migration and the origins of viral pandemics. There is longstanding disagreement over the use and validity of certain phylogeographic inference methodologies. In this paper, we highlight three distinct frameworks for phylogeographic inference to give a taste of this disagreement. Each of the three approaches presents a different viewpoint on phylogeography, most fundamentally on how we view the relationship between the inferred history of a sample and the history of the population the sample is embedded in. Satisfactory resolution of this relationship between history of the tree and history of the population remains a challenge for all but the most trivial models of phylogeographic processes. Intriguingly, we believe that some recent methods that entirely avoid inference about the history of the population will eventually help to reach a resolution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available