4.7 Article

Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors

Journal

TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 4-6

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE LONDON
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2007.07.008

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Double-blind peer review, in which neither author nor reviewer identity are revealed, is rarely practised in ecology or evolution journals. However, in 2001, double-blind review was introduced by the journal Behavioral Ecology. Following this policy change, there was a significant increase in female first-authored papers, a pattern not observed in a very similar journal that provides reviewers with author information. No negative effects could be identified, suggesting that double-blind review should be considered by other journals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available