Journal
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages 235-241Publisher
CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.02.010
Keywords
publication bias; reporting bias; cognitive sciences; neuroscience; bias
Funding
- National Institute on Drug Abuse US Public Health Service [DA017441]
- Institute of Medicine (IOM) (Puffer/American Board of Family Medicine/IOM Anniversary Fellowship)
- British Heart Foundation
- Cancer Research UK
- Economic and Social Research Council
- Medical Research Council
- National Institute for Health Research under the UK Clinical Research Collaboration
- EU-GEI
- Fetzer Franklin Fund
- Laura and John Arnold Foundation
- Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
- John Templeton Foundation
- Medical Research Council [MC_UU_12013/6] Funding Source: researchfish
- MRC [MC_UU_12013/6] Funding Source: UKRI
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Recent systematic reviews and empirical evaluations of the cognitive sciences literature suggest that publication and other reporting biases are prevalent across diverse domains of cognitive science. In this review, we summarize the various forms of publication and reporting biases and other questionable research practices, and overview the available methods for probing into their existence. We discuss the available empirical evidence for the presence of such biases across the neuroimaging, animal, other preclinical, psychological, clinical trials, and genetics literature in the cognitive sciences. We also highlight emerging solutions (from study design to data analyses and reporting) to prevent bias and improve the fidelity in the field of cognitive science research.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available