4.6 Review

Reciprocal relations between cognitive neuroscience and formal cognitive models: opposites attract?

Journal

TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages 272-279

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE LONDON
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.04.002

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research
  2. Australian Research Council [DP0878858]
  3. National Institutes of Mental Health [R01-MH092345]
  4. Australian Research Council [DP0878858] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cognitive neuroscientists study how the brain implements particular cognitive processes such as perception, learning, and decision-making. Traditional approaches in which experiments are designed to target a specific cognitive process have been supplemented by two recent innovations. First, formal cognitive models can decompose observed behavioral data into multiple latent cognitive processes, allowing brain measurements to be associated with a particular cognitive process more precisely and more confidently. Second, cognitive neuroscience can provide additional data to inform the development of formal cognitive models, providing greater constraint than behavioral data alone. We argue that these fields are mutually dependent; not only can models guide neuroscientific endeavors, but understanding neural mechanisms can provide key insights into formal models of cognition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available