4.5 Article

Interspecific competition induces asymmetrical rooting profile adjustments in shrub-encroached open oak woodlands

Journal

TREES-STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages 997-1006

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00468-012-0677-8

Keywords

Quercus ilex; Retama sphaerocarpa; Cistus ladanifer; Dehesa; Root plasticity; Niche separation

Categories

Funding

  1. Spanish Research Program [AGL 2006-09435]
  2. Regional Government of Extremadura (Consejeria de Economia, Comercio e Innovacion)
  3. Fondo Social Europeo

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is recognized that the extent of woody encroachment is increasing worldwide, but less is known concerning the likely altered below-ground structure of co-occurring plants. The aim of this study was to analyze the root system plasticity of three layers of vegetation growing together (trees, shrubs and pasture) and identify potential mechanisms of competition avoidance. Root morphology and distribution of trees, pasture and two contrasting shrub species (deep and shallow rooted) were studied in open oak woodlands of south-western Spain. Soil samples were obtained from paired adjacent plots, with and without shrubs, by taking soil cores to a depth of 3 m. Analysis of tree and pasture root systems in the presence of shrubs revealed significant reductions in root biomass and consistent increases in specific root length. Additionally, root profiles changed substantially, becoming significantly deeper for trees and shallower for pasture. In contrast, both types of shrub increased their root biomass when growing in competition, but without significantly modifying their rooting profile. Shrubs seem to be stronger competitors for below-ground resources than neighboring species. However, trees and pasture show clear plastic responses to shrub presence, irrespective of their rooting patterns, probably to minimize competitive interactions and maximize resource acquisition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available