4.7 Article

Nitrogen fixation by Elaeagnus angustifolia in the reclamation of degraded croplands of Central Asia

Journal

TREE PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages 799-808

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpp017

Keywords

afforestation; N-15 natural abundance technique; P; euphratica; salinity; soil fertility; U; pumila; Uzbekistan

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Extensive degradation of irrigated croplands, due to increasing soil salinity and depletion of soil nutrient stocks, is a major problem in Central Asia (CA), one of the largest irrigated areas in the world. To assess the potential for improving the productive capacity of degraded lands by afforestation, we examined N-2 fixation of Elaeagnus angustifolia L. in mixed plantations with non-fixing Populus euphratica Oliv. and Ulmus pumila L. Fixation of N-2 was quantified by the N-15 natural abundance technique based on both foliar and whole-plant sampling during five consecutive growing seasons. Despite elevated root-zone soil salinity (610dSm(1)) and deficiency in plant-available P (415mgkg(1)), N-2 fixation (%Ndfa) increased from an initial value of 20% to almost 100% over 5years. Within each growing season, %Ndfa steadily increased and peaked in the fall. Annual N-2 fixation, determined using foliar N-15, initially averaged 0.02Mgha(1), peaked at 0.5Mgha(1) during the next 2years and thereafter stabilized at 0.3Mg ha(1). Estimates based on whole-plant N-15 were < 10% lower than those based on foliar N-15. The increase in plant-available soil N was significantly higher in E. angustifolia plots than in P. euphratica and U. pumila plots. Increases in the concentrations of organic C (19%), total N (21%) and plant-available P (74%) in the soil were significant irrespective of tree species. This improvement in soil fertility is further evidence that afforestation with mixed-species plantations can be a sustainable land use option for the degraded irrigated croplands in CA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available