4.5 Article

Genetic diversity in peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] at the University of Florida: past, present and future

Journal

TREE GENETICS & GENOMES
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages 1399-1417

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11295-014-0769-2

Keywords

Population structure; Loci under selection; Stone fruit; Breeding; Genetics; Low chill

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The University of Florida (UF) stone fruit breeding and genetics program was created in 1952 to develop early ripening stone fruit cultivars with high quality, adaptation to summer rainfall, low chilling requirements, and the ability to withstand high disease pressure. Diverse germplasm sources were used to introduce desirable traits in UF breeding pool. The main objective of this research was to determine the genetic diversity and population structure of the breeding germplasm, and to search for loci under selection. A total of 195 peach genotypes were used: UF cultivars and advanced selections (n = 168), cultivars and selections from the UF-UGA-USDA joint breeding effort (n = 13), landrace cultivars (n = 4), high-chilling cultivars released by NCSU (n = 5), and related Prunus (n = 5) species. A total of 36 SSR markers distributed across the peach genome amplified 423 alleles. An average of 18 genotypes were detected per marker: A (number of observed alleles) of 11.43, Ae (effective number of alleles) of 2.58, Ho (observed heterozygosity) of 0.4, He (expected heterozygosity) of 0.52, F (Wright's fixation index) of 0.25, and PIC (polymorphism information content) of 0.48. UPGMA cluster analysis based on Nei's genetic distance represented best the known pedigree information for the germplasm pools. Two major groups were observed across the germplasm corresponding to melting and non-melting flesh cultivars/selections. Population structure results supported these two major groups. Several loci closely located to genome regions where different phenotypic traits have been previously mapped were detected to be under selection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available