4.2 Article

Effect of L-theanine on glutamatergic function in patients with schizophrenia

Journal

ACTA NEUROPSYCHIATRICA
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages 291-296

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/neu.2015.22

Keywords

glutamine plus glutamate; L-theanine (N-ethyl-L-glutamine); magnetic resonance spectroscopy; schizophrenia

Funding

  1. Taiyo Life Insurance Himawari Foundation, Tokyo, Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Glutamatergic dysfunction in the brain has been implicated in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Previous studies suggested that L-theanine affects the glutamatergic neurotransmission and ameliorates symptoms in patients with schizophrenia. The aims of the present study were twofold: to examine the possible effects of L-theanine on symptoms in chronic schizophrenia patients and to evaluate the changes in chemical mediators, including glutamate + glutamine (Glx), in the brain by using H-1 magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). Method: The subjects were 17 patients with schizophrenia and 22 ageand sex-matched healthy subjects. L-Theanine (250 mg/day) was added to the patients' ongoing antipsychotic treatment for 8 weeks. The outcome measures were the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores and MRS results. Results: There were significant improvements in the PANSS positive scale and sleep quality after the L-theanine treatment. As for MRS, we found no significant differences in Glx levels before and after the 8 week L-theanine treatment. However, significant correlations were observed between baseline density of Glx and change in Glx density by L-theanine. Conclusions: Our results suggest that L-theanine is effective in ameliorating positive symptoms and sleep quality in schizophrenia. The MRS findings suggest that L-theanine stabilises the glutamatergic concentration in the brain, which is a possible mechanism underlying the therapeutic effect.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available