4.7 Article

A systematic decision criterion for the elimination of useless overpasses

Journal

TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE
Volume 42, Issue 8, Pages 1043-1055

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2008.03.003

Keywords

multi-criteria decision; overpass; K-means; pair-wise comparison technique; support vector machine (SVM)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Seoul Metropolitan Government (SMG) recently considered eliminating some useless overpasses that had once played a significant role in maintaining continuous traffic flow but soon lost their original, positive function and became an environmental burden. SMG is in the process of identifying such types of overpasses out of 22 installations. The aim of this study was to develop a definite criterion that can be used to identify overpasses to be eliminated. All of the 22 existing overpasses were investigated in terms of functionality, structural stability and conflicts with other sustainable policies of SMG. Functionality was interpreted based on the traffic efficiency, environmental amenity and traffic safety. The weights of these functionality sub-factors were derived from a pair-wise comparison technique used in analytic hierarchy process (AHIP) methodology. The remaining two aspects were not subdivided but evaluated directly. Final judgments were made based an the three aspects with the assistance of well-known classification methodologies such as K-means and a support vector machine ISM). As a result, five overpasses in Seoul were identified to be eliminable. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available