4.1 Article

A Novel and Personalized Rehabilitation Program for Obese Kidney Transplant Recipients

Journal

TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS
Volume 46, Issue 10, Pages 3431-3437

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2014.05.085

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction. Physical rehabilitation programs for kidney transplant recipients are not routinely personalized to patients' physical and emotional health, which could result in a potentially limited health impact, shorter-term participation, and an overall low success rate. Materials and Methods. We conducted an internal review board-approved randomized prospective study involving a 12-month supervised multidisciplinary rehabilitation program (GH method) initiated after kidney transplantation in obese recipients (body mass index >30). The new method incorporates 3 major components: physical exercise, behavioral interventions, and nutritional guidance. We compared 9 patients who underwent supervised rehabilitation with 8 patients who underwent standard care. Patients were followed up after the start of the intervention, and multiple assessments were performed. Results. The adherence to training and follow-up was 100% in the intervention group, compared with 25% at 12 months in the control group. There was a trend for a higher glomerular filtration rate in the intervention group compared with the control group (55.5 +/- 18.6 mL/min/1.73 m(2) vs 38.8 +/- 18.9 mL/min/1.73 m(2), P = .06). The quality of life (SF-36) mean score improved more in the intervention group compared with the control group (583 +/- 13 vs 436 +/- 22, P = .008). There was a significantly higher employment rate in the intervention group, 77.7% at 12 months compared with 12.5% in the control group (P = .02). Conclusions. Our preliminary results suggest that this comprehensive approach to physical rehabilitation can improve adherence, kidney function, quality of life, and employment rate for obese patients after kidney transplantation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available