4.1 Article Proceedings Paper

Factors Determining Social Function of Patients After Renal Transplantation in Taiwan

Journal

TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS
Volume 46, Issue 2, Pages 481-483

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.09.044

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Patients who are no longer in need of dialysis as a consequence save time and reduce stress every day. Social function was an important issue in patients with successful renal transplantation. According Bandura's social cognitive theory, ones' behavior is affected by social context and affective factors continuously. The quality of social function needs further investigation. Purpose. The aims of this study were to describe the degree of social function after renal transplantation and to explore its predictive factors. Method. A cross-sectional and descriptive study design was conducted in the outpatient department of a medical center in northern Taiwan from July to October 2010. The recipients were a convenience sample of 101 participants who had undergone renal transplantation. Hierarchical multivariate regression analysis was used to explore the predictive factors related to social function. Results. The results showed that renal transplant recipients have moderate to high social function. Regression analyses showed that psychological factors (perceived stress, stress after renal transplantation, and depressive symptoms) and social participation (paid-work and leisure activity) explained 37.1% of the total variance for social function. Depressive symptoms explained most of the total variance. Conclusion. After renal transplantation, patients experienced higher levels of social function. Perceived stress, stress after renal transplantation, depressive symptoms, paid-work, and leisure activity were the predictive factors of social function. Managing levels of depressive symptoms is highly recommended to elevate the patient's social function.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available