4.1 Article Proceedings Paper

Mesenchymal Stem Cells Infusion Prevents Acute Cellular Rejection in Rat Kidney Transplantation

Journal

TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS
Volume 42, Issue 4, Pages 1331-1335

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.03.079

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) are multipotent cells that differentiate into various mature cell lineages. MSC show immunomodulatory effects by inhibiting T-cell proliferation. We evaluated the effect of the infusion of MSC in rats experimental kidney transplantation. Sprague-Dawley transgenic rats (SD) able to express the green fluorescent protein (EGFP) were used as MSC donors. Syngeneic (Lewis to Lewis, n = 10) and allogeneic (Fischer to Lewis, n = 10) kidney transplantations were performed after bilateral nephrectomy. Five transplanted rats who received syngeneic grafts, were treated with 3 x 10(6) MSC (Or B), while the other 5 did not received MSC (Gr A). Five rats with allogenic grafts received 3 x 10(6) MSC (Or C) and another 5 did not receive MSC (Gr D). The MSC were infused directly into the renal artery of the graft. No immunosuppressive therapy was provided. The animals were killed after 7 days. Biochemical analysis for renal function, histological (Banff criteria) and immunohistological analysis (ED1+ and CD8+) were performed on treated animals. MSC improved kidney function in Gr B and D vs Gr A and C. The tubular damage appeared to be less severe among Or B and Gr D with respect to Or A and C (P < .01). Vasculitis was more accentuated in Gr A and C (P < .01). MSCs reduced the inflammatory infiltrate; in Gr B and D, the number of ED1+ cells was lower than in Gr A and C (P < .005), which was also observed for CD8+ cells (P < .05). Our study demonstrated that the infusion of MSC attenuated histological damage from acute rejection by reducing the cellular infiltration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available