4.1 Article

Moving toward the Deliberate Coproduction of Climate Science Knowledge

Journal

WEATHER CLIMATE AND SOCIETY
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages 179-191

Publisher

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/WCAS-D-14-00050.1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Department of the Interior Southwest Climate Science Center [G13AC00326]
  2. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Climate Program Office [NA12OAR4310124]
  3. Climate Assessment for the Southwest program at the University of Arizona [NA11OAR4310150]
  4. California Nevada Applications Program at the Desert Research Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Coproduction of knowledge is believed to be an effective way to produce usable climate science knowledge through a process of collaboration between scientists and decision makers. While the general principles of coproduction-establishing long-term relationships between scientists and stakeholders, ensuring two-way communication between both groups, and keeping the focus on the production of usable science-are well understood, the mechanisms for achieving those goals have been discussed less. It is proposed here that a more deliberate approach to building the relationships and communication channels between scientists and stakeholders will yield better outcomes. The authors present five approaches to collaborative research that can be used to structure a coproduction process that each suit different types of research or management questions, decision-making contexts, and resources and skills available to contribute to the process of engagement. By using established collaborative research approaches scientists can be more effective in learning from stakeholders, can be more confident when engaging with stakeholders because there are guideposts to follow, and can assess both the process and outcomes of collaborative projects, which will help the whole community of stakeholder-engaged climate-scientists learn about coproduction of knowledge.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available