4.1 Article

Influence of Immunosuppressive Drugs on the Development of CD4+CD25high Foxp3+ T Cells in Liver Transplant Recipients

Journal

TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS
Volume 42, Issue 7, Pages 2599-2601

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.04.026

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction. Many studies suggest that CD4(+)CD25(high) T regulatory cells (Tregs) have a crucial role in downregulating the immune response to alloantigens. In this study, we investigated the possible influence of immunosuppressive therapy, including rapamycin and calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs; tacrolimus), on level of Tregs in liver allograft recipients. Materials and Methods. We assessed 47 liver transplant recipients with stable liver function for years, dividing them into 2 groups: Patients receiving rapamycin (n = 15), and those receiving tacrolimus (n = 32). Thirty-eight, age-matched healthy subjects were used as normal controls. We examined the expression of CD4, CD25, and Foxp3 in peripheral blood T cells. Flow cytometry was performed with a FACSCalibur instrument with data analysis using Cell Quest software. Results. Rapamycin significantly increased the prevalence of Tregs, including the percentage of CD4(+)CD25(high) T cells in total lymphocytes and among total CD4 T cells, compared with the healthy subjects and the CNI group. The prevalence of Tregs in the CNIs group was significantly lower than that of controls. Foxp3 was expressed in >95% of CD4(+)CD25(high)T cells, whereas it was in <20% of CD4(+)CD25(low) T cells and not expressed among CD4(+)CD25(-) T cells. Conclusions. Immunosuppressive therapy (rapamycin or CNIs) may have a different roles in tolerance induction among liver transplant recipients. Namely, rapamycin promoted the induction of a profile consistent with alloantigen tolerance; CNIs hampered this progression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available