4.1 Article Proceedings Paper

Evaluation of Clinical Safety of Conversion to Advagraf Therapy in Liver Transplant Recipients: Observational Study

Journal

TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages 2184-2186

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.06.085

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. To present the correlation between dosage and plasma concentration of tacrolimus and the consequences for short-term hepatorenal function of conversion to Advagraf (tacrolimus extended-release capsules) in liver transplant recipients. Patients and Methods. This observational study on adult liver transplant recipients examined tacrolimus levels after conversion to Advagraf therapy. Mean (SD) patient age was 51 (44-59) years. Conversion occurred at 43 (19-85) months posttransplantation, and follow-up was 193 (106.5-243.25) days. Dosage was adjusted milligram for milligram. Levels of tacrolimus, total bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transferase, alkaline phosphatase, and creatinine were recorded on the day before conversion to Advagraf and 1, 3, 6, and months afterward. Results. Of the 79 patients in whom therapy was converted to Advagraf, 31 (39.2%) had alcoholic cirrhosis, 19 (24.1%) had viral disease, 10 (12.7) had mixed disease, 8 (10.1%) had cholestatic disease, 4 (5.1%) had metabolic disease, and 7 (8.8%) had other diseases. Despite no modification of Advagraf dosage during follow-up in most patients, mean tacrolimus levels decreased from the first month after conversion; however, at 6 months after conversion, they tended to equal the initial value. Renal function and liver biochemistry values demonstrated no significant change during follow-up. Conclusion. Although tacrolimus levels decreased initially after conversion to Advagraf therapy, 1:1 conversion is safe for hepatorenal function in liver transplant recipients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available