4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Sevoflurane Prevents Liver Inflammatory Response Induced by Lung Ischemia-Reperfusion

Journal

TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 98, Issue 11, Pages 1151-1157

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000408

Keywords

Liver ischemia-reperfusion injury; Lung transplantation; Sevoflurane

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Transplants cause ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury that can affect distant organs. Liver is particularly sensitive to IR injury. The present randomized experimental study was designed to investigate a possible protective effect of sevoflurane against liver inflammatory response to lung IR in a lung upper lobe left autotransplant model. Methods. Two groups (sevoflurane and control) of eight swines each were submitted to upper lobe left lung autotransplant. Hypnotic maintenance was performed with sevoflurane 3% or propofol 8 to 10 mg/kg per hr until pneumonectomy was done; then propofol was used for all animals. Blood and liver samples were taken in four different moments: prepneumonectomy, prereperfusion, 10 min postreperfusion and 30 min postreperfusion to measure levels of interleukin (IL)-1 beta, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, monocyte chemotactic protein (MCP)-1, nuclear factor (NF)-kappa B, C-reactive protein, ferritin and caspase 3. Non-parametric test was used to find statistical meaning. Results. Lung IR markedly increased the expression of TNF-alpha, IL-1 beta, MCP-1, NF-kappa B and caspase activity in control livers compared with basal levels, whereas liver IL-10 expression decreased 10 and 30 min post-reperfusion. Sevoflurane significantly decreased TNF-alpha, IL-1 beta, MCP-1, NF-kappa B liver expression and caspase 3 activity. Sevoflurane also reverted the lung IR-induced decrease in IL-10 expression. Conclusions. The present results indicate that lung IR caused hepatic injury. Sevoflurane attenuated liver injury in a model of upper lobe left lung autotransplant in pigs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available