4.6 Article

HLA-Specific Antibodies Developed in the First Year Posttransplant are Predictive of Chronic Rejection and Renal Graft Loss

Journal

TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages 568-574

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181b11b72

Keywords

Alloantibodies; HLA; Transplantation; Chronic rejection; Allograft survival

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Evidence shows posttransplant antibodies lead to renal allograft failure, but does the time elapsed between transplantation and antibody development impact allograft survival? This is the first study showing importance of when antibodies appear. Methods. Serial sera were collected during 17 years (1991-2008) from two groups of patients, one whose allograft failed due to chronic rejection containing 25 patients (230 sera) and a control group consisting of 25 graft functioning patients (305 sera) who were matched by transplant date to a patient whose graft failed. Results. The median follow-up for failure patients was 7.1 +/- 4.8 years and 11.8 +/- 4.4 years for controls. Human leukocyte antigens alloantibodies appeared in 24 of 25 (96%) of the failed patients and 48% of the controls (P < 0.0001). Time to antibodies also differed between groups. Fifteen (60%) patients from the failure group developed antibodies by I year compared with none in the control group. Hazard ratio of antibodies present in 1-year posttransplant from multivariate analysis for allograft loss was 7.77 (P < 0.001). Ten-year renal allograft survival in early antibody developers (< 1 year) was 27% vs. 80% in the late antibody developers. Conclusions. Overall, human leukocyte antigens antibody development within 1-year posttransplantation markedly lowers allograft survival compared with later antibody development. Therefore, monitoring early antibodies is useful.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available