4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Kidney Transplantation for Primary Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis: Outcomes and Response to Therapy for Recurrence

Journal

TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 87, Issue 8, Pages 1232-1239

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31819f12be

Keywords

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis; Kidney transplantation; Recurrent disease; Plasmapheresis; Rituximab

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. For a subset of adults and children with primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), proteinuria and renal dysfunction recur after kidney transplantation (KTx). Predicting recurrence and response to plasmapheresis (PP) or other interventions remains problematic. Methods. The prevalence, recurrence rate, outcomes, and treatment responses of patients with FSGS were determined among 1573 KTx recipients. Although 5.0% carried some diagnosis of FSGS, only 1.9% (n=30) met strict diagnostic criteria for primary FSGS including biopsy-proven FSGS, lack of secondary factors, negative family history, and progression to end-stage renal disease within 10 years. Results. Of these, 47% had recurrent FSGS compared with 8% of those not meeting strict criteria (P<0.001). Recurrence was more common in children compared with adults (86% vs. 35%, P=0.01). Graft survival was lower for recipients with primary FSGS compared with all others and inferior graft survival was attributable to recurrent FSGS. Fourteen patients received PP preemptively (pre-KTx) or therapeutically (post-KTx) for recurrent disease. Four pediatric patients additionally received anti-CD20 (rituximab) therapy. Of the different treatment approaches, only PP combined with rituximab was associated with prolonged remission of proteinuria. Conclusions. The results indicate that patients at high risk for FSGS recurrence can be identified and may benefit from carefully planned peritransplant interventions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available