4.6 Article

Early Experience of Paired Living Kidney Donation in the United Kingdom

Journal

TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 86, Issue 12, Pages 1672-1677

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181901a3d

Keywords

Paired donation; Kidney exchange; Living donor

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Paired living kidney donation became possible in the United Kingdom in 2006 after the introduction of a new legal framework for organ donation. A national matching scheme was subsequently established and we report the early United Kingdom experience of paired donation. Methods. A new national matching algorithm was developed for the introduction of paired donation in the United Kingdom. Initially, all potential two-way exchanges were identified with prioritization according to a points system based on geographical proximity between pairs, calculated human leukocyte antigen antibody reaction frequency (CRF), HLA mismatch of potential transplant, and donor-donor age difference. Three-way exchanges were additionally considered after the first year. Results. The list for paired donation has grown steadily as 3-monthly matching runs have been carried out from April 2007,and in July 2008 there were 85 couples registered. Eight paired donor transplants have resulted with a number of identified exchanges unable to proceed. Fewer potential exchanges have been identified than expected due to blood group composition (47 of 85 donors of group A compared with 16 potential recipients [A, AB]) and high levels of cRF (95%-100% in 35% of patients) among listed patients. Conclusions. Paired donation has been introduced successfully in the United Kingdom, adding to living donor transplant activity. The new national program has yielded fewer transplants than initially anticipated but as the scheme evolves, with the use of altruistic, nondirected donors to start a chain of transplants, an increase in the number of successful paired donation transplants is anticipated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available