4.6 Article

Association between a polymorphism in the IL-12p40 gene and cytomegalovirus reactivation after kidney transplantation

Journal

TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 85, Issue 10, Pages 1406-1411

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31816c7dc7

Keywords

IL-12p40; genetic polymorphism; cytomegalovirus infection; kidney transplantation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is associated with a significant rate of morbidity after organ transplantation. The genetic factors influencing its occurrence have been little investigated. IL-12 plays a crucial role in anti-infectious immune responses, especially by stimulating IFN gamma production. An A-to-C single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) within the 3'-untranslated region of the IL-12p40 gene has been characterized and was reported to be both functionally and clinically relevant. However, the impact of this single nucleotide polymorphism on events after organ transplantation has never been reported. Methods. In this study, we investigated the impact of the 3'-untranslated region polymorphism on the occurrence of CMV infection in 469 kidney recipients transplanted at the University Hospital of Tours between 1995 and 2005. The polymorphism was genotyped using the restriction fragment length polymorphism method and CMV infection was determined by pp65 antigenemia. Results. Multifactorial Cox regression analysis demonstrated that the presence of the C allele was an independent risk factor for CMV infection (OR = 1.52, P = 0.043), the risk being even higher when study was restricted to patients with positive CMV serological status before the graft and who did not receive any CMV prophylaxis (OR = 1.88, P = 0.028). Conclusions. This study identified a new genetic risk factor for CMV reactivation after kidney transplantation. The results of our study suggest that C carriers might especially benefit from CMV prophylaxis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available