4.6 Article

Impact of human immunodeficiency virus on survival after liver transplantation: Analysis of United Network for Organ Sharing database

Journal

TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 85, Issue 3, Pages 359-368

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181605fda

Keywords

hepatitis C; hepatitis B; coinfection; HAART; MELD

Funding

  1. PHS HHS [234-2005-370011C] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. The outcome of liver transplantation (LT) in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) has been a matter of controversy. Methods. A retrospective cohort study was performed to assess the impact of HIV on LT survival by using United Network for Organ Sharing registry Standard. Transplant Analysis and Research files. Results. A total of 138 HIV(+) and 30,520 HIV(-) patients who were >= 18 years old and underwent LT during the highly active antiretroviral therapy era (starting January 1, 1997) in the United States were included. Among all HIV(+) patients, the estimated 2-year survival probability was lower (70%) than among non-HIV patients (81%). This excess risk appeared entirely among those with coinfections, that is, HIV with hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus (HCV), as none of the 24 HIV-infected patients who did not have hepatitis B virus or HCV died during an average of 1.2 years of follow-up per person. Among HCV(+) patients, those with HIV coinfection had significantly lower survival rates than patients without HIV (P=0.006). Controlling for age, coinfection, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores, and other potential confounders in a proportional hazards regression analysis, HIV(+) patients had a hazard ratio of 1.41 (P=0.14, 95% confidence interval: 0.90-2.22) for mortality after LT. Conclusion. HIV(+) patients without HCV coinfection seemed to have good prognosis, whereas patients who had HlV/HCV coinfection had poor outcomes, which were significantly worse than that seen in those with HCV alone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available