4.5 Article

Renal function three years after early conversion from a calcineurin inhibitor to everolimus: results from a randomized trial in kidney transplantation

Journal

TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages 42-51

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/tri.12437

Keywords

calcineurin inhibitor; conversion; everolimus; glomerular filtration rate; kidney transplantation; long-term; renal function

Funding

  1. Novartis Scandinavia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In a 36-month, open-label, multicenter trial, 202 kidney transplant recipients were randomized at week 7 post-transplant to convert to everolimus or remain on cyclosporine: 182 were analyzed to month 36 (92 everolimus, 90 controls). Mean (SD) change in measured GFR (mGFR) from randomization to month 36 was 1.3 (14.0)ml/min with everolimus versus -1.7 (15.4)ml/min in controls (P=0.210). In patients who remained on treatment, mean mGFR improved from randomization to month 36 by 7.9 (11.5)ml/min with everolimus (n=37) but decreased by 1.4 (14.7)ml/min in controls (n=62) (P=0.001). During months 12-36, death-censored graft survival was 100%, patient survival was 98.9% and 96.7% in the everolimus and control groups, respectively, and 13.0% and 11.1% of everolimus and control patients, respectively, experienced mild biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR). Protocol biopsies in a limited number of on-treatment patients showed similar interstitial fibrosis progression. Donor-specific antibodies were present at month 36 in 6.3% (2/32) and 18.0% (9/50) of on-treatment everolimus and control patients with available data (P=0.281). During months 12-36, adverse events were comparable, but discontinuation was more frequent with everolimus (33.7% vs. 10.0%). Conversion from cyclosporine to everolimus at 7weeks post-transplant was associated with a significant benefit in renal function at 3years when everolimus was continued.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available