4.5 Article

Kinetics of peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations predicts the occurrence of opportunistic infection after kidney transplantation

Journal

TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages 674-685

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/tri.12321

Keywords

cytomegalovirus; kidney transplantation; lymphocytopenia; monitoring; opportunistic infection; peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness
  2. Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias [FIS 11/01538]
  3. Fundacion Mutua Madrilena de Investigacion Medica [FMM 2010/0015]
  4. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Instituto de Salud Carlos III) [CM11/00187]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Serial monitoring of peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations (PBLSs) counts might be useful in predicting post-transplant opportunistic infection (OI) after kidney transplantation (KT). PBLSs were prospectively measured in 304 KT recipients at baseline and post-transplant months 1 and 6. Areas under receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate the accuracy of different subpopulations in predicting the occurrence of overall OI and, specifically, cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease. We separately analyzed patients not receiving (n=164) or receiving (n=140) antithymocyte globulin (ATG) as induction therapy. In the non-ATG group, a CD8+ T-cell count at month 1 <0.100x103cells/l had negative predictive values of 0.84 and 0.86 for the subsequent occurrence of overall OI and CMV disease, respectively. In the multivariate Cox model, a CD8+ T-cell count <0.100x103cells/l was an independent risk factor for OI (adjusted hazard ratio: 3.55; P-value=0.002). In the ATG group, a CD4+ T-cell count at month 1 <0.050x103cells/l showed negative predictive values of 0.92 for the subsequent occurrence of overall OI and CMV disease. PBLSs monitoring effectively identify KT recipients at low risk of OI, providing an opportunity for individualizing post-transplant prophylaxis practices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available