4.2 Article

Six-month incidence of bloodstream infections in intestinal transplant patients

Journal

TRANSPLANT INFECTIOUS DISEASE
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages 242-247

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3062.2011.00683.x

Keywords

bloodstream infections; intestinal transplant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Intestinal transplantation has emerged as an established treatment for life-threatening intestinal failure. The most common complication and cause of death is infection. Risk of infection is highest during the first 6 months, as a consequence of maximal immunosuppression, greater than that required for any other organ allograft. Methods. We performed a retrospective chart review of all (56) adult and pediatric (<18 years) small bowel transplant patients at our institution between November 2003 and July 2007, and analyzed the 6-month post-transplant incidence of bloodstream infections (BSIs). We evaluated multiple risk factors, including inclusion of a colon or liver, total bilirubin >5, surgical complications, and acute rejection. Results. A BSI developed in 34 of the 56 patients, with a total of 85 BSI episodes. Of these BSI episodes, 65.9% were due to gram-positive organisms, 34.1% gram-negative organisms, and 2.4% due to fungi. The most common isolates were Enterococcus species, Enterobacter species, Klebsiella species, and coagulase-negative staphylococci. Inclusion of the liver and/or a preoperative bilirubin >5 mg/dL appeared to increase the incidence of BSI (P = 0.0483 and 0.0005, respectively). Acute rejection and colonic inclusion did not appear to affect the incidence of BSI (P = 0.9419 and 0.8248, respectively). The BSI incidence was higher in children (P = 0.0058). Conclusions. BSIs are a common complication of intestinal transplantation. Risk factors include age <18, inclusion of the liver, and pre-transplant bilirubin >5. Acute rejection and colon inclusion do not appear to be associated with increased BSI risk.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available