4.2 Article

Risk factors for late-onset cytomegalovirus disease in donor seropositive/recipient seronegative kidney transplant recipients who receive antiviral prophylaxis

Journal

TRANSPLANT INFECTIOUS DISEASE
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages 244-249

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3062.2011.00624.x

Keywords

cytomegalovirus disease; kidney transplant; risk factor; retransplantation

Funding

  1. Roche
  2. Vical
  3. Viropharma
  4. Chimerix
  5. Genentech
  6. [CA 15704]
  7. [CA 18029]
  8. [HL093294]
  9. [AI084019]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease occurs frequently after cessation of antiviral prophylaxis in CMV-seronegative kidney transplant recipients from seropositive donors (D+R-), and the risk factors are incompletely defined. Methods. We retrospectively assessed the incidence, clinical features, and risk factors for CMV disease in a cohort of D+R- kidney transplant recipients who received antiviral prophylaxis at a single US transplant center using descriptive statistics and Cox proportional hazards models. Results. CMV disease developed in 29 of 113 (26%) D+R- patients at a median of 185 days (interquartile range 116-231 days) post transplant, including CMVsyndrome (66%) and tissue invasive disease (34%). The incidence of CMVdisease was higher in patients who underwent re-transplantation (57% vs. 24%) and this factor was independently associated with a higher risk of CMVdisease in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 4.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-13; P = 0.016). Other demographic and transplant variables were not independently associated with a risk of late-onset CMVdisease. Conclusions. Despite a comprehensive analysis of patient and transplant variables, only re-transplantation was identified as a risk factor for CMVdisease in D+R- kidney transplant recipients who received antiviral prophylaxis, but had limited clinical predictive value. The development of novel laboratory markers to identify patients at greatest risk for CMVdisease should be a priority for future studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available