4.2 Article

Intimal fibrosis in human cardiac allograft vasculopathy

Journal

TRANSPLANT IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 2-3, Pages 124-132

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2011.07.001

Keywords

Allograft vasculopathy; Chronic rejection; Fibrosis; Macrophages; Transplantation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy (CAV) is one of the major complications for patients after heart transplantation. It is characterized by a concentric luminal narrowing due to (neo) intimal expansion in the coronary arteries of donor hearts after heart transplantation. In this process fibrosis plays an important role. Aim of this study is to analyze the factors and cells involved in this fibrotic process. Coronary arteries from five heart transplantation patients and three controls were obtained at autopsy. Quantitative real-time PCR was performed on mRNA obtained from various arterial layers isolated by laser micro dissection. Positive gene expression was confirmed by immunohistochemistry and/or in situ hybridisation. The strongest mRNA expression of fibrotic factors (predominantly pro-fibrotic) was found in the neo-intima. Especially, connective tissue growth factor expression was higher in the CAV vessels than in the controls. The lymphocyte activity of interferon gamma was only detected in CAV vessels. Furthermore as shown by in situ hybridisation, the lymphocytes producing interferon gamma also expressed transforming growth factor beta. Anti-fibrotic factors, such as bone morphogenic protein 4, were only expressed in CD3(-)/CD68(-) stromal cells. Macrophages present in the CAV and control vessels showed to be of the M2 type and did not produce any fibrotic factor(s). In conclusion, T-cells producing both interferon gamma and transforming growth factor beta, may play an important role in the fibrotic process in CAV vessels by upregulation of connective tissue growth factor production. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available