4.2 Article

The effect of murine anti-thymocyte globulin on experimental kidney warm ischemia-reperfusion injury in mice

Journal

TRANSPLANT IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 1-2, Pages 44-54

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2009.08.001

Keywords

Ischemia-reperfusion injury; Anti-thymocyte globulin; Immune mechanisms

Funding

  1. Genzyme Corp
  2. US National Institutes of Health
  3. US National Kidney Foundation
  4. Talecris Biotech.Inc
  5. Korea Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Kidney ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) is an important contributor to delayed graft function (DGF) and poor outcome of allografts. Small clinical studies suggest a beneficial role for human anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) in DGF. We investigated the short-term effect of mouse anti-thymocyte globulin (mATG) on kidney warm IRI in mice. We administered either mATG, rabbit immunoglobulin (RIgG), or saline with different dosing schedules in three different IRI models: 30 min bilateral, 60 min bilateral, and 45 min unilateral IRI. mATG effectively depleted circulating T cells but had less effect on kidney-infiltrating T cells. There was no difference in serum creatinine levels between groups in each study. Scoring of renal tubular damage and regenerating tubules revealed no difference between groups. The percentage of CD3(+)CD4(-)CD8(-) double-negative (DN) T cells, which were reported to contribute to the pathogenesis of lupus nephritis, increased and the percentages of regulatory T cells and NK cells decreased in the post-ischemic kidneys of mATG treated mice. mATG did not alter the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IFN-gamma or anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10 in post-ischemic kidneys. mATG treatment, whether initiated before ischemia or immediately after reperfusion, had minimal effects on renal injury following warm IRI in mice. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available