4.5 Article

Evaluation of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response in Women with Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Using Ultrasound Elastography

Journal

TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages 17-24

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1593/tlo.12412

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation - Ontario Region
  2. Terry Fox Foundation
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  4. Cancer Care Ontario Research Chair

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE: Ultrasound elastography is a new imaging technique that can be used to assess tissue stiffness. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of ultrasound elastography for monitoring treatment response of locally advanced breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy. METHODS: Fifteen women receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy had the affected breast scanned before, 1, 4, and 8 weeks following therapy initiation, and then before surgery. Changes in elastographic parameters related to tissue biomechanical properties were then determined and compared to clinical and pathologic tumor response after mastectomy. RESULTS: Patients who responded to therapy demonstrated a significant decrease (P < .05) in strain ratios and strain differences 4 weeks after treatment initiation compared to non-responding patients. Mean strain ratio and mean strain difference for responders was 81 +/- 3% and 1 +/- 17% for static regions of interest (ROIs) and 81 +/- 3% and 6 +/- 18% for dynamic ROIs, respectively. In contrast, these parameters were 102 +/- 2%, 110 +/- 17%, 101 +/- 4%, and 109 +/- 30% for non-responding patients, respectively. Strain ratio using static ROIs was found to be the best predictor of treatment response, with 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity obtained 4 weeks after starting treatment. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that ultrasound elastography can be potentially used as an early predictor of tumor therapy response in breast cancer patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available