4.5 Article

The relationship between hypoxia, proliferation and outcome in patients with de novo glioblastoma: a hypothesis

Journal

TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages 160-169

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1593/tlo.09265

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [RO1 CA 75285, RO1 CA 113561, R21 CA 93007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The hypoxia and proliferation index increase with grade in human glial tumors, but there is no agreement whether either has prognostic importance in glioblastomas. We evaluated these end points individually and together in 16 de novo human glioblastomas using antibodies against the 2-nitroimidazole hypoxia detection agent EF5 and the proliferation detection agent Ki-67. Frozen tumor tissue sections were fluorescence-stained for nuclei (Hoechst 33342), hypoxia (anti-EF5 antibodies), and proliferation (anti-Ki-67 antibodies). EF5 binding adjacent to Ki-67+ cells, overall EF5 binding, the ratio of these values, and the proliferation index were evaluated. Patients were classified using recursive partitioning analysis and followed up until recurrence and/or death. Recursive partitioning analysis was statistically significant for survival (P = .0026). Overall EF5 binding, EF5 binding near Ki-67+ cells, and proliferation index did not predict recurrence. Two additional survival analyses based on ratios of the overall EF5 binding to EF5 binding near Ki-67+ cells were performed. High and low ratio values were determined by two cutoff points: (a) the 50% value for the ratio [EF5/Ki-67(Binding)]/[Tumor(binding)] = Ratio(EF5) (50%) and (b) the median EF5 value (75.6%) of the ratio [EF5/Ki-67(Binding)]/[Tumor(binding)] = Ratio(patients median). On the basis of the Ratio(EF5 50%), recurrence (P = .0074) and survival (P = .0196) could be predicted. Using the Ratiopatients median, only survival could be predicted (P = .0291). In summary, patients had a worse prognosis if the [EF5/Ki-67(Binding)]/[Tumor(binding)] ratio was high. A hypothesis for the mechanisms and translational significance of these findings is discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available