4.5 Article

In Vivo Quantitative Microvasculature Phenotype Imaging of Healthy and Malignant Tissues Using a Fiber-Optic Confocal Laser Microprobe

Journal

TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages 84-94

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1593/tlo.08118

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [PO1CA117969, RO1EB001872, U24CA092782]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Real-time in vivo imaging of the microvasculature may help both earlier clinical detection of disease and the understanding of tumor-host interaction at various stages of progression. In vivo confocal and multiphoton microscopy is often hampered by bulky optics setup and has limited access to internal organs. A fiber-optic setup avoids these limitations and offers great user maneuverability. We report here the in vivo validation of a fiber-optic confocal fluorescence microprobe imaging system. In addition, we developed an automated fractal-based image analysis to characterize microvascular morphology based on vessel diameter distribution, density, volume fraction, and fractal dimension from real-time data. The system is optimized for use in the far-red and near-infrared region. The flexible 1.5-mm-diameter fiber-optic bundle and microprobe enable great user maneuverability, with a field of view of 423 x 423 mu m and a tissue penetration of up to 15 mu m. Lateral and axial resolutions are 3.5 and 15 mu m. We show that it is possible to obtain high temporal and spatial resolution images of virtually any abdominal viscera in situ using a far-red blood pool imaging probe. Using an orthotopic model of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, we characterized the tumor surface capillary and demonstrated that the imaging system and analysis can quantitatively differentiate between the normal and tumor surface capillary. This clinically approved fiber-optic system, together with the fractal-based image analysis, can potentially be applied to characterize other tumors in vivo and may be a valuable tool to facilitate their clinical evaluation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available