4.7 Article

Retrieval of Both Soil Moisture and Texture Using TerraSAR-X Images

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 7, Issue 8, Pages 10098-10116

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs70810098

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. MISTRALS/SICMED
  2. ANR AMETHYST [ANR-12 TMED-0006-01]
  3. TOSCA/CNES projects
  4. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-12-TMED-0006] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this paper is to propose a methodology combing multi-temporal X-band SAR images (TerraSAR-X) with continuous ground thetaprobe measurements, for the retrieval of surface soil moisture and texture at a high spatial resolution. Our analysis is based on seven radar images acquired at a 36 degrees incidence angle in the HH polarization, over a semi-arid site in Tunisia (North Africa). The soil moisture estimations are based on an empirical change detection approach using TerraSAR-X data and ground auxiliary thetaprobe network measurements. Two assumptions were tested: (1) roughness variations during the three-month radar acquisition campaigns were not accounted for; (2) a simple correction for temporal variations in roughness was included. The results reveal a small improvement in the estimation of soil moisture when a correction for temporal variations in roughness is introduced. By considering the estimated temporal dynamics of soil moisture, a methodology is proposed for the retrieval of clay and sand content (expressed as percentages) in soil. Two empirical relationships were established between the mean moisture values retrieved from the seven acquired radar images and the two soil texture components over 36 test fields. Validation of the proposed approach was carried out over a second set of 34 fields, showing that highly accurate clay estimations can be achieved. Maps of soil moisture, clay and sand percentages at the studied site are derived.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available