4.7 Article

Using RPAS Multi-Spectral Imagery to Characterise Vigour, Leaf Development, Yield Components and Berry Composition Variability within a Vineyard

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 7, Issue 11, Pages 14458-14481

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs71114458

Keywords

precision viticulture; remote sensing; remotely piloted aerial system; spectral indices; kappa index

Funding

  1. Televitis project - Agencia de Desarrollo Tecnologico de La Rioja (La Rioja, Spain) [ADER-2008-00187]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Implementation of precision viticulture techniques requires the use of emerging sensing technologies to assess the vineyard spatial variability. This work shows the capability of multispectral imagery acquired from a remotely piloted aerial system (RPAS), and the derived spectral indices to assess the vegetative, productive, and berry composition spatial variability within a vineyard (Vitis vinifera L.). Multi-spectral imagery of 17 cm spatial resolution was acquired using a RPAS. Classical vegetation spectral indices and two newly defined normalised indices, NVI1 = (R-802 - R-531)/(R-802 + R-531) and NVI2 = (R-802 - R-570)/(R-802 + R-570), were computed. Their spatial distribution and relationships with grapevine vegetative, yield, and berry composition parameters were studied. Most of the spectral indices and field data varied spatially within the vineyard, as showed through the variogram parameters. While the correlations were significant but moderate among the spectral indices and the field variables, the kappa index showed that the spatial pattern of the spectral indices agreed with that of the vegetative variables (0.38-0.70) and mean cluster weight (0.40). These results proved the utility of the multi-spectral imagery acquired from a RPAS to delineate homogeneous zones within the vineyard, allowing the grapegrower to carry out a specific management of each subarea.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available