4.2 Article

RHD and RHCE variant and zygosity genotyping via multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification

Journal

TRANSFUSION
Volume 53, Issue 7, Pages 1559-1574

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03919.x

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundThe presence of a D variant may hamper correct serologic D typing, which may result in D immunization. D variants can be determined via RHD genotyping. However, a convenient single assay to identify D variants is still lacking. We developed and evaluated a multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) assay to determine clinically relevant RHD and RHCE variant alleles and RHD zygosity. Study design and methodsWe analyzed 236 cases (73 normal and 163 selected samples) with the RH-MLPA assay, which is able to determine 79 RHD and 17 RHCE variant alleles and RHD zygosity. To confirm the results, mutations were verified by RHD and/or RHCE exon-specific sequencing and RHD zygosity was verified by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for 18 cases. ResultsIn 99% of the cases, the RH-MLPA assay correctly determined whether a person carried only wild-type RHD and RHCE alleles (n=69) or (a) variant RHD allele(s) and/or (a) variant RHCE allele(s) (n=164). In only three cases, including two new RHD variant alleles, the variant allele was not identified, due to lack of detecting probes. These were RHD*DCS2, a new partial RHD allele, RHD*525T (Phe175Leu), and a new D- null allele, RHD*443G (Thr148Arg). All RHD (n=175) and RHCE variant alleles (n=79) indicated by the RH-MLPA assay were confirmed by sequencing. RHD zygosity was confirmed by quantitative PCR. Two hematopoietic chimeras were recognized. ConclusionThe RH-MLPA genotyping assay is a fast, easy, and reliable method to determine almost all clinically relevant RHD and RHCE variant alleles, RHD zygosity, and RHD+/RHD- chimeras in blood donors, blood recipients, and pregnant women.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available