4.2 Article

Is red blood cell rheology preserved during routine blood bank storage?

Journal

TRANSFUSION
Volume 50, Issue 4, Pages 941-948

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02521.x

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Red blood cell (RBC) units stored for more than 2 weeks at 4 degrees C are currently considered of impaired quality. This opinion has primarily been based on altered RBC rheologic properties (i.e., enhanced aggregability, reduced deformability, and elevated endothelial cell interaction), during prolonged storage of nonleukoreduced RBC units. In this study, the rheologic properties and cell variables of leukoreduced RBC units, during routine blood bank storage in saline-adenine-glucose-mannitol, were investigated. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Ten leukoreduced RBC units were stored at the blood bank for 7 weeks at 4 degrees C. RBCs were tested weekly for aggregability, deformability, and other relevant variables. RESULTS: RBC aggregability was significantly reduced after the first week of storage but recovered during the following weeks. After 7 weeks aggregability was slightly, but significantly, reduced (46.9 +/- 2.4-44.3 +/- 2.2 aggregation index). During storage the osmotic fragility was not significantly enhanced (0.47 +/- 0.01% phosphate-buffered saline) and the deformability at shear stress of 3.9 Pa was not significantly reduced (0.36 +/- 0.01 elongation index [EI]). The deformability at 50 Pa was reduced (0.58 +/- 0.01-0.54 +/- 0.01 EI) but remained within reference values (0.53 +/- 0.04). During 5 weeks of storage, adenosine triphosphate was reduced by 54% whereas mean cell volume, pH, and mean cell hemoglobin concentration were minimally affected. CONCLUSIONS: RBC biochemical and physical alterations during storage minimally affected the RBC ability to aggregate and deform, even after prolonged storage. The rheologic properties of leukoreduced RBC units were well preserved during 7 weeks of routine blood bank storage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available